1. Where can we find the institutions and their main functions 

The European cities that hold the most important institutions are Brussels, Strasbourg, Luxembourg, and Frankfurt am Main. There are seven main institutions according to Article 13 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). Many other European capitals host either agencies, bodies, or liaison offices for better oversight on the ground. Especially for issues like the respect of human rights in member countries that are under the protection of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights or the correct and proper usage of EU funds.

a. Brussels 

Source: https://epthinktank.eu/2016/11/03/places-in-brussels-of-symbolic-significance-for-europe/ 

Brussels is the heart of Europe, hosting most of the EU institutions that have liaison offices around the EU. The European Parliament building in Brussels is where most of the operational and political work is done, even though it’s theoretically not the official seat of the institution. It hosts committee meetings, where amendments, (the position that the Parliament takes on proposals coming from the Commission) are drafted [1].  It is also where meetings of political groups (EPP, Renew Europe, EFA/Greens, etc.) are held and where additional voting in mini-plenary sessions are organised.

The European Commission is the main executive body, which also proposes laws that are then checked and either approved, modified, or rejected by the Parliament and the Council of the EU. 

The Council of the EU (often referred to simply as The Council), formed by the ministers of each EU member state, is the second legislative body next to the Parliament. It represents  national governments’ positions and priorities on different subjects, such as agriculture, foreign policy or economy. 

The European Council, where the heads of the national governments gather 4 times a year. While they cannot directly pass laws, they set the political agenda of the Union. The planning is coordinated by the Council’s president during the entirety of the legislative mandates of the European Parliament and the duration of the Commission’s presidency. The Council expresses their priorities in drafted documents called “Conclusions”, which the European Commission has an obligation to follow. [2]

b. Strasbourg

Source: https://www.coe.int/en/web/about-us/map-and-access

Hosts the official building of the European Parliament, where 12 plenary meetings and the State of the Union (SOTEU) take place. It also hosts the Council of Europe and its adjacent judiciary institution, the European Court of Human Rights. These two function outside of EU law, as the Court has jurisdiction over all members of the Council of Europe, which totals 46 countries from Europe and the Caucasian region. 

c. Luxembourg

Most of the EU institutions and central offices in Luxembourg are concentrated in the Kirchberg plateau neighbourhood, the home of Robert Schuman, one of the EU founding fathers. Luxembourg symbolically represents EU unity, is located in between 4 different EU countries, and was one of the founders of the European Community. It is the second largest city according to the number of EU institutions based there, such as administrative offices for the European Commission and the European Parliament.

In Luxemburg the European Commission deploys units and Directorates-General that are mainly specialised in the fields of Statistics (like Eurostat), Translation and Human Ressources.

Other institutions located here are the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), (which has jurisdiction in all 27 Member States) and the European Court of Auditors (ECA). It also hosts, as according to Protocol No. 6 of the Treaties of the European Union,  meetings of the Council of the EU during the months of April, June, and October to split powerful decision-making between any two member states. [3]

d. Frankfurt

The European Central Bank can be found in Frankfurt am Main. Its main role is to keep inflation in check and maintain price stability in the EU. It also keeps a check on the Eurozone, as it holds monetary authority over national banks, and, through the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) it supervises the largest and most significant commercial banks to ensure financial stability. [4]

Honourable mentions of committees and bodies:

Committee of the Regions

It represents local and regional authorities across the EU through its own distinct political groups that are directly connected to the ones in the Parliament. The groups are made up of local and regional elected officials such as mayors. The regional group names are confusingly similar to the Parliamentary groups: Group of the European People's Party (EPP) -> European People’s party; Party of European Socialists (PES) -> S&D; Renew Europe, carrying the same name; European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), also carrying the same name; and The Greens and Progressives -> The Greens/EFA. Some Parliamentary groups are not represented, such as The Left.

The other institutions are obliged to consult with CoR on local policy like transport, health, education, or the environment before passing legislation.

European Investment Bank

The European Investment Bank (EIB) is the publicly owned lending institution of the European Union, serving as the world's largest multilateral financial institution. Its primary role is to borrow money on capital markets and lend it at favourable rates to projects that support EU policy goals.

European Economic and Social Committee

It serves as a bridge between the institutions and civil society, including unions of workers.

European Ombudsman

The legal watchdog of the other institutions, committees, and bodies, including over decentralised agencies, for any maladministration. See more: https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/home 

2. Relevant agencies 

The attached map is an illustration of the most important decentralised agencies and their specific roles. Some of them don’t have their acronym attached to their domain, but they can easily be searched and identified. 

Source: European Correspondent

More of them can be found here: https://european-union.europa.eu/institutions-law-budget/institutions-and-bodies/search-all-eu-institutions-and-bodies_en 

About EUROPOL 

Is the law enforcement agency of the EU, with the headquarters in The Hague, the Netherlands. Even if it’s a law enforcement agency, it doesn’t have executive authority. It cannot make arrests, but it coordinates complex international operations and assists with intelligence,  involving crimes like drug trafficking. It cooperates with international partners, where investigators collaborate with national authorities.

3. Influential lobbying groups 

• BusinessEurope, having frequent high-level meetings at the Commission

• CEFIC (European Chemical Industry Council) with a big presence in Brussels

• ACEA (European Automobile Manufacturers Association)

• Hydrogen Europe one of the biggest lobbyists in energy, is still backed by Shell and BP (British Petroleum), promoting policy favouring fossil fuel exploitation instead of regulating usage of fossil fuel. [5]

You can explore a detailed list here, selecting EU countries: https://www.integritywatch.eu/organizations.php?s=1 

More about EU lobbyists here: https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/02/eus-lobby-league-table 

And here: https://transparency.eu/who-has-been-lobbying-the-european-commission/ 

Sources:

1. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/organisation-and-rules/organisation/committees 

2. https://european-union.europa.eu/institutions-law-budget/institutions-and-bodies/search-all-eu-institutions-and-bodies/european-council_en   

3. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:07cc36e9-56a0-4008-ada4-08d640803855.0005.02/DOC_13&format=PDF   

4. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/intro/html/index.en.html   

5. https://corporateeurope.org/en/2025/11/dirty-industrial-deal-faqs-part-iv-hydrogen-carbon-capture 

Volt calls for a strong climate policy that tackles the causes of climate change to prevent things from getting worse (climate mitigation) and that provides for adjustments to cope with the effects of climate change to limit the damage (climate adaptation). 

3000 lives and up to 6 billion euros in economic damage

More and more data is becoming available on the impact of last summer's persistent heat and drought. The most recent estimates point to considerable damage in Belgium and across Europe.

Economy and industry

Based on several studies it reviewed, the Climate Risk Assessment Center (CERAC) estimated in September 2026 that the economic damage caused by the heatwaves of summer 2026 could rise to nearly 6 billion euros in Belgium [1]. That is roughly 1 percent of Belgium's gross domestic product (GDP). This drop in GDP would mainly be due to reduced labour productivity. Heat makes workers less efficient and reduces the number of hours worked, especially in sectors involving a lot of physical labour, such as agriculture, construction and certain industrial activities.

Agriculture and food

According to CERAC, we are looking at losses of 3 to 7 percent in agriculture. As stated by the federal Minister of Economy, initial estimates show major losses in crops [2]. In some regions, the potato harvest is heading for expected losses of 40 to 50 percent. For maize, local yield losses could reach 50 to 75 percent. Livestock farming is suffering too. The extreme heat led to higher animal mortality, falling milk production and additional health problems among livestock.

Environment and living conditions

The Belgian health institute Sciensano calculated the number of heat-related human deaths at nearly 3,000 [3]. These figures cover all of Belgium over the three heatwaves of summer 2026. The first heatwave, at the end of June, was the deadliest. The breakdown by age and sex showed excess mortality across all adult age groups [4]. In absolute numbers, excess mortality was highest among people aged 65 and over.

Nature and biodiversity

The Walloon Public Service (SPW) and the services of the Governor of Liège estimated that around 3,000 hectares of nature were destroyed in the High Fens [5]. Extreme heat, persistent drought and strong winds caused the fire to spread rapidly. Later assessments put the damage at some 3,300 hectares [6].

Europe

Considerable damage occurred across Europe. Researchers at Triodos Bank warn that the extreme heat could wipe out Europe's economic growth [7]. They estimate that heat will reduce the EU's GDP in 2026 by about 1 percent — exactly the growth that was forecast for this year. Across Europe, rivers also ran far too low, making water transport much more difficult. A number of power plants were also temporarily shut down because there was too little water to cool them.

These figures show that climate change is not a distant problem. Persistent heat and drought caused by climate change have a negative impact on our economy and industry, agriculture and food security, health and quality of life, local nature, and our supply chains and energy supply. While heatwaves used to be an exceptional phenomenon, they have now become a structural risk.

Our addiction to fossil fuels

The main cause of climate change is our collective addiction to fossil fuels for energy production. This fossil-fuel-based energy system is responsible for roughly three quarters of global greenhouse gas emissions. Burning fossil fuels as a source of energy produces enormous CO₂ emissions. The resulting increase in atmospheric CO₂ enhances the greenhouse effect, warming the planet. This, among other things, manifests itself in longer periods of heat and drought, which in turn leads to the damage described above. Without addressing this cause, we risk more frequent and more intense periods of heat and drought.

A second major cause is our food system, which accounts for roughly a quarter of global greenhouse gas emissions. Livestock emits methane, a gas far more potent than CO₂. Forests are cut down to make way for cattle grazing and animal feed, releasing stored carbon and destroying one of nature's most important CO₂ sinks. Fertilisers, machinery, transport, food waste and more add further emissions. The key point is that animal products need far more land and cause far more emissions per kilogram or per calorie than plant-based foods, while a third of all food produced is never eaten. That's why eating less meat and dairy and wasting less food (food transition) is the biggest climate lever we have outside the energy transition. Nevertheless, we cannot ignore farmers' income and livelihood, and their inclusion in any transition must be ensured.

In addition, the plans needed to cope with increased risk of heat, fires, drought and also flooding are often still missing or inadequate and are not sufficiently coordinated across borders. These shortcomings make us extra vulnerable to the effects of climate change.

Electrification and adaptation

Volt Belgium advocates measures that are socially and economically feasible and that both limit further global warming and reduce the resulting damage. The key is to lower our CO₂ emissions and strengthen our resilience to the effects of heat, fires, drought and flooding.

Climate mitigation

To tackle the main cause of current climate change, we must electrify one process after another, while at the same time making our electricity increasingly sustainable. Electrification is needed in areas such as mobility, home heating and industrial processes. To generate the necessary electricity, we must invest in solar energy, wind energy and other forms of renewable energy. And we also need to find ways to store that energy, to deal with periods of low wind or little sun, and to upgrade our grid to handle the growing electricity demand.

Figures show that this is no utopia. In the EU, renewable energy already supplied 48 percent of all electricity in 2025 [8]. This makes renewable energy the EU's largest source of electricity — bigger than all fossil fuels combined.

Investing in renewable energy also makes us more resilient to geopolitical instability. Just think of the impact on oil and gas prices of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the US-Israeli war with Iran. Alongside the climate benefits, we gain strategic autonomy, and on top of that, cleaner and healthier air.

For Volt Belgium, nuclear energy is part of today's energy mix. As construction time is the longest and most expensive part of nuclear energy, existing plants should remain operational for as long as possible.

For Volt, a global long-term vision for our energy system also requires thinking at a European level to secure electricity supply. Depending on the specific context of a European country, the emphasis can be placed on certain technologies. Belgium, for example, could focus on offshore wind farms and on making the most of its nuclear expertise. Belgium could leverage its nuclear expertise for research into Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), safety, decommissioning, and also medical applications.

Climate adaptation

Meanwhile, climate change is no longer a future scenario but a reality. Even if we reduced our CO₂ emissions to zero tomorrow, the consequences of climate change would still be here. Belgium must therefore prepare for more heat, fires, drought and flooding. That is why we must systematically invest in resilience, for example, heat plans that provide more public cool places and green space, water management that protects against both drought and flooding (e.g., scaling up the Blue Deal in Flanders), nature restoration focusing on peatlands and rewetting, climate-resilient infrastructure designed to withstand and recover from climate impacts, and labour plans protecting workers exposed to extreme heat stress.

Volt Belgium's call to action

Volt Belgium calls for a Belgian climate plan that is: 

• Ecologically ambitious: achieve climate neutrality (net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) as fast as is realistically achievable and in line with the European Green Deal, and implement adequate adaptation plans for heat waves, wildfires, drought and flooding.

• Socially just: support low-income households through the energy transition, and pay special attention to people and communities living in precarious conditions hit hardest by climate change. 

• Economically sound: support the competitiveness of our economy during the climate transition, including industry and agriculture.

• Pragmatic: build a sustainable energy mix with a clear role for both renewables and nuclear energy. Consider areas for energy consumption reduction, often overlooked.

• European: think cross-border, advocating the same ambitious climate plan across all European countries.

Sources

[1] https://www.cerac.be/en/publications/2026-09-economic-impact-heatwaves-belgium-what-revealed-summer-2026

[2] https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2026/09/23/hitte-landbouw-schade/

[3] https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2026/09/02/hittedoden-zomer-2026-sciensano-hittegolf-klimaat-belgie/

[4] https://www.sciensano.be/nl/pershoek/oversterfte-van-de-hittegolf-van-juni-2026-verdere-analyse

[5] https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/liveblog/provinciale-fase-rampenplan-opgeheven-in-hoge-venen-~1787109504614/

[6] https://www.nieuwsblad.be/binnenland/een-maand-na-het-uitbreken-van-brand-in-hoge-venen-heeft-het-vuur-zon-3.300-hectare-verwoest/161272303.html

[7] https://www.triodos.be/nl/artikelen/2026/dit-is-het-prijskaartje-van-een-extreem-hete-zomer

[8] https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/european-electricity-review-2026/

Iceland referendum is an open door to a bright future between the EU and Iceland

A positive decision will strengthen the EU, protect Iceland’s sovereignty, and open the Union to new agreements, alliances, as well as welcome new citizens into our community.  The membership application of Iceland was never withdrawn, as mentioned by the European Commission's president Ursula von der Leyen in an official visit to Iceland in July 2025, even though they were temporarily put on hold in 2013. The validity of the membership application is covered in the memorandum produced by the Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

A bit of history

On 17 July 2009, Iceland’s application for EU membership was submitted to the Council of the European Union, signed by the Prime Minister and Minister for Foreign Affairs to Sweden which was then holding the Council’s  presidency. On February 24, 2010, the Commission delivered a positive advice and recommended the opening of negotiations for EU accession, which officially started in June of the same year. In 2013, due to a change in government, from a  social-democratic party to a centre-right alliance whose focus lay in fear of losing fishing rights, accession talks were interrupted.

There are a total of 35 negotiation chapters that a country in the process of joining the EU goes through, organised under 6 bigger clusters, such as internal markets, competitiveness and fundamentals, like judiciary rights. At the time of interruption, 27 out of 35 chapters were opened, but out of the 27 chapters, 11 were provisionally closed (read: completed). The accession meetings took place between 2010 and 2012, with the last meeting held on 18 December 2012. In 2015, the Icelandic government asked to no longer be considered a candidate country because the government considered that the national interests were better served outside the bloc.

Why the negotiations were put on hold

Fishing is a fundamental part of Icelandic society, and even if the issue was covered in Chapter 13, Iceland put the chapter on hold and has not submitted a negotiating position. Due to global warming, the mackerel population migrated to Iceland from Scottish and Welsh waters, which led to excessive fishing conducted by Iceland and the UK's fishing industry having greater competition. Additionally, Iceland was one of the countries in Europe most heavily affected by the 2008 financial crisis, as their main national banks collapsed. To counterbalance, it tried to compensate with an economic dominance over the surrounding international waters. Even as the accession process was stopped, Iceland maintained close cooperation with the EU. Today, the state is a member of the European Economic Area (EEA) agreement, a member of Schengen since December 2000, and a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). In 2021, the government started pursuing closer interest in the EEA. The country is also a member of NATO, even though it’s the only member without a national army. It also upholds a longstanding bilateral defence agreement with the US.

Source: https://adepteconomics.com.au/icelands-secret-first-hand-account-of-2008-financial-crisis-delivers-important-lessons/

Source: https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article/69/7/1289/745283 

Source: https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1269138/uk-fishing-brexit-iceland-cod-wars-eu-european-union-common-fisheries-policy-spt

Trump the second

Once Trump came to  power again in January 2025, he started  mentioning the strategic gains from potentially annexing the semi-autonomous Danish territory of Greenland while also confusing Iceland with Greenland. This made the  Icelandic government grow progressively more worried and see itself in a potentially vulnerable position. As a consequence, Iceland is holding a referendum on  August 29th, asking its citizens whether the country should reopen negotiation talks with the EU. After the Parliamentary Resolution No. 14/157 was passed on the 28th of May, the referendum question was decided to be: “Should Iceland resume accession negotiations with the European Union?” The possible answers are “Yes” and “No”. Even though formerly closed chapters will need to be reviewed again, this process is likely to happen relatively fast. It must be mentioned also that in March 2026, Iceland already signed a Security and Defence Partnership with the EU.

What’s in it for the EU?

In practical terms, the adherence of a new state to the EU presents itself as an opportunity for the Union, as almost 400 thousand people would become EU citizens, an economically performant state would join (Iceland’s GDP per capita is comparable to that of states like Luxembourg and Ireland), and a new strategic position of the bloc would be gained in the High North. One of the most fundamental elements of our Union is the possibility of more people working, travelling and fulfilling their dreams within the EU, contributing to the federal Europe we are fighting for. 

Iceland’s accession would require changes, such as adding at least 6 more MEPs to the European Parliament and Icelandic becoming the 25th official language of the bloc. The Union would also gain a significant advantage through a security lens. In the past the high north was hard to access since the strategically significant Svalbard archipelago is Norwegian territory, which is not yet an EU member. The High North is a highly important region for European security against Russia, especially since the Russian Federation holds significant nuclear deterrent assets in the Kola Peninsula. 

Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-f92bc043-3893-4688-8937-fd9cad8b0d5b

Conclusion

From an Icelandic perspective, the country would lose some autonomy on the fishing rights of the nearby waters, which is a critical source of economic prosperity for the island. In times of low tourism caused by pandemics and rising living costs, this is extra painful, as Iceland is highly reliant on tourism. However, as an insular country, greater access to an international market is paramount, and further isolation is a great risk.

The government’s decision to halt the negotiations is yet another proof of how isolationism presented as protectionism is not the long-term answer and can stand as an example of how nationalism can stand in the way of development. 

Volt welcomes Iceland to the EU. United, we can protect our sovereignty, economies, and liberal democracies. United we stand strong against outside harm, such as territorial and financial integrity breaches, and disregard for international agreements and alliances.

Context

Vegetation fires are no longer a phenomenon confined to southern Europe. From Spain to Scotland, fires are becoming more frequent, more intense, and increasingly difficult to contain. Belgium is no longer immune to this reality: the major fire in the High Fens is a stark example.

More than 3,000 hectares have been ravaged by the flames in the High Fens, and hundreds of residents have had to be evacuated [1]. The peatlands and heathlands of the High Fens are among the most valuable ecosystems in our country. Their loss would affect an entire ecosystem and essential functions such as carbon storage, biodiversity and water regulation. Even if vegetation regrows, the nutrient-poor soils will significantly slow regeneration: it will take decades, and potentially a century for some forest stands, to recover landscapes comparable to those that existed before the fire. For peatlands, formed over thousands of years, restoration will take even longer and may never fully recreate the original state [2].

It is the most severe wildfire ever recorded in Belgium [3].

Volt expresses its full solidarity with the firefighters, farmers, forest rangers, and the many volunteers mobilised to fight the flames. We also welcome and encourage European solidarity and the arrival of reinforcements from neighbouring countries.

But putting out the flames is not enough…

The priority is to tackle climate change

Scientists have been warning about climate change for decades. It is primarily driven by human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels. Among other effects, it contributes to longer and more intense periods of heat and drought, increasing the risk of wildfires.

Belgium is particularly vulnerable to water scarcity. It ranks 18th among the 25 countries facing extreme water stress every year [4], notably due to its high population density, pollution, extensive soil sealing and rapid water drainage. This situation increases our exposure to drought. 234 vegetation fires have already been recorded in Belgium since the beginning of this year, more than twice the number recorded during the whole of 2025 [5].

In Wallonia, 18% of Walloon households are located within 200 metres of an area at high risk of wildfires. 41% are located within 400 metres [6].

CERAC experts (Climate Change Risk Analysis Centre) also warn of a significant increase in the risk of vegetation fires over the next 10 to 15 years [7].

But preventing wildfires also means addressing their immediate causes: more than 90% of vegetation fires are linked to human activity [8]. Prevention, monitoring and spatial planning can therefore play a decisive role in reducing their frequency.

Faced with this reality, the political response should be clear: prevent and prepare.

And yet…

As the risks associated with wildfires and climate change increase, Belgium must strengthen its capacity to respond. Our fire and rescue services are already under pressure: the country has around 17,000 firefighters, while the number of volunteers is declining and emergency response zones are facing staffing shortages. Underfunding and staff shortages limit their ability to cope with crises that can now affect several regions simultaneously [9]. Beyond staffing and funding, a report by the Belgian Wildfire Network, bringing together researchers from Ghent University (UGent) and the University of Liège, highlights further weaknesses in Belgium’s capacity to address wildfires, including a lack of data, equipment and expertise, as well as the complexity of governance and the distribution of responsibilities among public authorities [10].

The recent fires in the High Fens also exposed weaknesses in our ability to monitor and communicate environmental health risks. The population was not warned quickly enough about the presence of fine particles in the smoke, despite very high PM2.5 concentrations being recorded locally [11].

At the same time, climate action remains insufficient and is still facing political pushback. In 2025, Deputy Prime Minister David Clarinval, among others, called for certain climate and environmental measures to be put “on pause” [12], while in Flanders, the government scaled back some of its climate ambitions [13]. As climate-related risks intensify, we must instead invest both in our response capacity and in prevention.

Belgium’s national aerial capacity for fighting vegetation fires remains limited. The recent orders for Chinook and H145M helicopters [14] represent a welcome strengthening of the Defence Forces’ capabilities and can also provide valuable support in the event of a major wildfire. However, they must form part of a broader strategy, combining aerial capabilities, ground resources, prevention, early detection and cross-border cooperation.

This is why Volt calls for:

• Jointly procure firefighting helicopters with Luxembourg and the Netherlands;

• Assess the use of Belgian A400M aircraft as a complementary capability for aerial water or fire-retardant drops; 

• Strengthening early detection and warning systems, in order to intervene before fires gain momentum and ensure that the population is promptly warned when smoke poses a health risk;

• Developing a national and interregional database on vegetation fires, recording fire starts, burned areas, weather conditions, causes, interventions and damage, in order to improve prevention, risk assessment and resource planning;

• Establishing a federal coordination mechanism for vegetation fires and strengthening cooperation between the federal government, the Regions and emergency services, in order to coordinate response efforts and rapidly mobilise additional resources in the event of a major fire;

• Strengthening the prevention of fire outbreaks during periods of high risk, notably through targeted information campaigns, temporary restrictions on certain high-risk activities and better enforcement of existing rules;

• Integrating vegetation-fire risk into spatial planning, particularly in areas where homes or vulnerable infrastructure are located next to forests, heathlands or other fire-prone natural areas;

• Adapting the management of our forests, land and water to climate risks, notably by diversifying tree species and reducing the continuity of flammable vegetation, with particular attention to fire-prone conifer monocultures;

• Creating strategic measures to break up the continuity of combustible vegetation, adapted to different ecosystems and designed in consultation with nature managers, while restoring wetlands to strengthen the resilience of our territories;

• Compensating farmers mobilised in the High Fens for the hours worked and any material damage incurred;

• Strengthening staffing, specialised training and equipment for firefighters, the Civil Protection and forest rangers;

• And above all, gradually phasing out our dependence on fossil fuels, in order to limit the worsening of climate change.

Tomorrow’s wildfires are not inevitable. But the risk of more frequent and more devastating vegetation fires will increase as climate change intensifies.

Let’s not wait for the next disaster to act.

Sources:

[1] https://www.rtbf.be/article/direct-incendie-dans-les-fagnes-habitants-evacues-2700-hectares-partis-en-fumee-les-pompiers-continuent-a-lutter-contre-le-feu-11770992 

[2] https://www.rtl.be/actu/environnement/10000-ans-dhistoire-pourraient-partir-en-cendres-lincendie-menace-un-ecosysteme/2026-08-18/article/797597

[3] https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/fr/2026/08/16/le-pire-incendie-de-foret-de-l-histoire-de-la-belgique-des-c/ 

[4] https://waterwiser.fr/actualites/la-belgique-face-au-stress-hydrique-extr%C3%AAme-mythe-ou-r%C3%A9alit%C3%A9

[5] https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2026/08/17/belgie-telde-op-13-augustus-al-234-natuurbranden-helft-meer-dan/

[6] https://www.cesewallonie.be/sites/default/files/uploads/Evenement/web%27actu%2016.10.2025/20251016_presentation%20J.Teller.pdf

[7] https://www.cerac.be/fr/news/2026-07-la-frequence-des-feux-de-vegetation-ne-cesse-daugmenter

[8] https://environnement.wallonie.be/feux 

[9] https://www.rtl.be/actu/lenquete/cest-une-reelle-catastrophe-les-pompiers-belges-debordes-et-trop-peu-nombreux/2026-06-07/article/790949 & https://www.lesoir.be/765408/article/2026-08-17/il-faut-agir-rapidement-le-president-des-pompiers-denonce-le-sous-financement

[10] https://www.standaard.be/politiek/negen-ministers-in-maart-al-gewaarschuwd-voor-bosbranden-maar-ze-bespraken-rapport-nooit/160228826.html

[11] https://www.rtl.be/actu/magazine/sante/alerte-aux-particules-fines-apres-lincendie-dans-les-hautes-fagnes-pourquoi-t/2026-08-19/article/797781

[12] https://www.lesoir.be/689901/article/2025-07-26/pour-sauver-lindustrie-clarinval-pret-mettre-en-pause-les-mesures-climatiques

[13] https://www.rtbf.be/article/le-nouveau-gouvernement-flamand-freine-ses-ambitions-climatiques-11442379, https://www.demorgen.be/nieuws/n-va-pleit-voor-klimaatpauze-onverantwoord-zegt-klimaatwetenschapper~bc9efce2/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F & https://daardaar.be/rubriques/environnement/rechauffement-climatique-labsence-dalarmisme-de-la-n-va-nuit-aux-plus-vulnerables/

[14] https://www.lalibre.be/belgique/politique-belge/2026/08/17/francken-veut-des-helicopteres-chinooks-mais-pour-certains-tout-ce-qui-est-americain-est-mauvais-YV3WAW3LUNCVRKTCXBLNMINTOE/

Border Crisis & Opportunism

On 30 and 31 July 2026, nearly 72,000 migrants attempted to reach the enclave of Ceuta, following the widespread circulation of false rumours, but also in the hope of finding a better life in Europe.

A Heavy Human and Political Toll

• 141 deaths, mostly by drowning;

• tensions between EU Member States;

• a wave of populism, identity politics and electoralism around a supposed “human tide” allegedly ready to invade Europe, widely amplified by Trump and Bardella.

Twenty-two European leaders condemned Spain’s handling of the crisis and called for tougher migration policies, with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen among the most prominent voices.

And in Belgium:

• the N-VA called for stronger border controls;

• Vlaams Belang (VB) and the MR called for Spain to be suspended from the Schengen Area.

Yet the crisis remained strictly confined to Ceuta.

Moreover, the migrants would not have been able to reach mainland Europe by sea without valid passports and visas. Almost all of them were returned to Morocco within a matter of hours.

Ultimately, none of these migrants reached mainland Europe.

Key elements were largely overlooked:

• the loss of life in this tragedy;

• the potential role of smugglers;

• the passivity of the Moroccan authorities.

And memory has been selective:

• Greece, Poland and Italy had themselves benefited from European solidarity when they faced crises or the instrumentalisation of migration: Greece in 2020 in the face of Ankara, Poland in 2021 in the face of Minsk, and Italy in 2023 at Lampedusa.

• Denmark had benefited from Spain’s support over the issue of Greenland.

• Eastern European states are strengthening their defences against Russian drones alongside their European allies.

Division comes at a geopolitical cost  

The renewed threats by Trump to annex Greenland are a case in point, as an American oil company linked to him has already brought drilling equipment to Greenland without authorisation from the local authorities.

Europe can no longer afford to be divided at the slightest crisis

Let us reject outbursts that are disconnected from reality, hypocritical and driven by electoral considerations: they address none of the structural challenges facing the EU’s migration policy.

Spain had to manage the crisis on its own and, like other EU border countries, remains exposed to new migration crises.

In Ceuta, calls to cross the border, massively circulated on social media, remain a current concern.

That is why we advocate for:

• Reducing outsourcing to third countries: The more the EU relies on foreign states to manage migration, like Morocco, the more vulnerable it becomes to the weaponisation of migration.

• Respecting human rights: They are universal and inalienable.

• Maintaining Schengen: Free movement is a pillar of the Union and a right of workers. It is not a playball for polititians seeking electoral gains. Instead, let us manage our external borders together.

• European solidarity and unity: It is time to move towards a genuine European federalist project, with a common direction and the means to act together, whether on migration, borders or foreign policy.

How Can You Take Action?

Join us to work for a stronger and federal Europe with clear decision making structures and unity when facing external threats to our territorial integrity, peace and prosperity https://volt.team/simple-join/en-BE

Join Volt’s We Are 1 Million initiative: www.wearethe1million.eu

The Middle East crisis exposes Europe's fossil fuel vulnerability

The conflict involving Iran, which resumed on July 8 after fighting last spring, has repeatedly threatened shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of global LNG trade and one-third of global seaborne oil trade pass (IEA and UNCTAD).

On 20 July, Houthi militants announced a maritime embargo targeting Saudi Arabia, heightening fears of disruptions to Gulf oil production and exports.

This resumption of hostilities triggered a sharp surge in oil and gas prices. Brent crude peaked at around $100 per barrel on 23 July, while the Dutch TTF natural gas benchmark reached €64.4/MWh on 24 July. This episode demonstrated how exposed European economies that rely on fossil fuel imports remain to geopolitical tensions.

Why does this episode matter beyond the immediate market reaction?

First, persistent disruptions keep energy prices elevated. As energy suppliers and many industrial consumers hedge part of their purchases, the longer wholesale gas prices remain elevated, the greater the pass-through to household energy bills and business operating costs.

Second, the start of this year's gas storage refill across Europe was delayed by a prolonged winter, renewed geopolitical  tensions in the Middle East, and volatility in global LNG markets. With winter approaching, Europe may have to replenish gas stocks under less favourable market conditions, increasing the risk of higher energy costs for households and businesses.

Belgium is particularly vulnerable. According to Fluxys data, its gas storage facilities were only around 31% full by the end of July.

This vulnerability is partially self-inflicted:

For more than two decades, Belgium maintained a nuclear phase-out framework adopted in 2003. While the framework was ultimately revoked in 2025, repeated uncertainty and reversals around nuclear policy discouraged investment decisions and left Belgium without a sufficiently robust replacement strategy when nuclear capacity declined. Of the country’s seven reactors, one was closed in 2022, another in 2023 and three more in 2025. The two remaining reactors have been under maintenance since April 2026, leaving Belgium temporarily without nuclear generation capacity.

In 2021, nuclear power accounted for 52.3% of Belgium’s electricity mix, according to Luminus. The renewable capacity added since then and new combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) projects, including ENGIE’s plant in Flémalle and Luminus’ project in Seraing, which is expected to become operational in 2027, are currently insufficient to offset this loss.

The lack of nuclear has created three major consequences for Belgium:

• Loss of electricity independence, as Belgium has been a net electricity importer since 2023.

• Greater exposure to higher electricity prices, as increased dependence on external markets and gas-fired generation can translate into higher costs for consumers, particularly during periods of supply tightness.

• Higher greenhouse gas emissions, as periods of low renewable generation require greater reliance on either gas-fired power plants or imported electricity that is not necessarily renewable.

Europe sovereignty begins with energy sovereignty

This incident and the energy crisis triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine make this lesson obvious: reducing Europe’s and Belgium’s dependence on fossil fuels is an absolute necessity. Yet political action has not matched the scale of the challenge:

According to FPS Economy, Russia still accounted for 11.6% of Belgium's gas consumption in 2025, a higher share than at the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, despite the EU's requirement to phase out Russian gas by 2027.

In parallel, Belgium recorded unprecedented volumes of U.S. LNG imports in 2025, reflecting Europe’s broader effort to diversify away from Russian gas supplies.

However, swapping one dependency for another is no solution. Europe’s real challenge is reducing fossil fuel imports.

Phasing out fossil fuels is not only a question of energy security. The same energy system that exposes us to geopolitical shocks is also driving a climate crisis that is already causing more frequent heatwaves, wildfires, and floods across Europe.

Reducing our dependence on fossil fuels is also an economic imperative. According to the European Central Bank, the European Union spends around €400 billion every year on fossil fuel imports. This represents a substantial transfer of wealth to fossil fuel-exporting countries and leaves the European economy exposed to global price shocks.

By investing in clean energy, we can:

• Reduce inflationary pressure and protect purchasing power

• Keep more spending within the European economy

• Create jobs

• Strengthen Europe’s long-term competitiveness

Among other things, Volt Belgium calls for:

• Accelerating the deployment of clean, low-carbon energy by simplifying permitting procedures, improving grid connections and mobilising investment in renewable and nuclear capacity while reducing reliance on fossil-fuel power plants.

• Strengthening Europe's electricity system through cross-border interconnections, grid modernisation, digitalisation, storage and demand-side flexibility.

• Reducing fossil fuel demand through building renovation, electrification of heating, heat pumps and clean technologies, while developing European industrial capacity for strategic energy technologies.

Energy sovereignty will not come from drilling more or importing more fossil fuels. It will come from producing more clean energy, using energy more efficiently and building the infrastructure Europe needs to control its own future.

Image: Times Today BD

War in the Middle East. Trade pressure against the European Union. An offensive against climate policies. Repeated attacks on democratic institutions. It was in this context that Brussels' Cinquantenaire Park was privatized for the celebration of the 250th anniversary of the United States.

The Cinquantenaire is one of the symbols of Belgian independence. Never before had a foreign state celebrated its national day by appropriating a site so emblematic of Belgium.

To secure the event, a major police operation was deployed: dogs, motorcycles, vans, helicopters... Meanwhile, the people of Brussels were denied access to their park and its fountain in the middle of a heatwave, while also enduring the noise pollution caused by the fireworks display.

Yet beyond these inconveniences, it is above all the symbolic significance of this event that raises important questions.

As Volt Belgium, we are not, in principle, opposed to the celebration of an allied country’s national day in our capital, especially as we share common values with many American citizens. However, we believe that, regardless of which country is concerned, such celebrations should not take place in locations that symbolize our sovereignty and independence.

Moreover, while we are grateful to the United States, in particular for its decisive contribution to the defeat of fascism during the Second World War, as well as for eight decades of transatlantic partnership that have largely served our shared interests, this recognition should not lead us to ignore recent developments in American policy under the presidency of Donald Trump. These changes make it difficult to reconcile the holding of such a celebration in the heart of Brussels with the values upheld by Belgium and the European Union, as well as with their strategic interests.

On the level of values, Belgium had no reason to display such indulgence toward a government whose policies challenge the rule of law, weaken climate commitments, and favour a confrontational approach to international relations. The attacks on judicial independence, the pressure exerted on press freedom, and the assault on the Capitol should have led the Belgian authorities to exercise greater restraint.

Beyond these differences in values, a series of recent initiatives by the American administration directly undermines European strategic interests: the unilateral imposition of tariffs on the European Union, the energy crisis triggered by the war in Iran, territorial claims over Greenland, not to mention explicit support for extremist parties in Europe. All of these signals should have constituted a red line, especially as policies of appeasement toward Donald Trump have historically proven of limited effectiveness.

The observed excesses have not been limited to the symbolic dimension of the event. Two European journalists covering the festivities were removed from the site by Belgian police at the request of the American ambassador Bill White, according to multiple consistent accounts, after he reportedly expressed dissatisfaction with their questions. This episode raises a fundamental question: Belgium must remain the guarantor of press freedom on its territory, regardless of any pressure exerted by a foreign authority.

As Volt Belgium, we express our full solidarity with the journalists concerned, call for the opening of an investigation into the intervention of the Belgian police, and urge the Belgian government, the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the European Council to unequivocally condemn these violations of press freedom.

Belgium is a sovereign state. Brussels is the capital of the European Union. The Cinquantenaire Park is not intended to serve as a backdrop for a display of power by a foreign state, especially when that state adopts policies that run counter to the values defended by Belgium and the European Union or undermine their strategic interests. In the context of these commemorations, the presence of so many of our leaders—from the President of the European Parliament Roberta Metsola to the NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, including the Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever—as well as their silence and passivity to date, is profoundly indecent.

This sequence of events reinforces the perception of an imbalance in which Brussels and, beyond it, the European Union give the impression of accepting a form of subordination to the United States. Europe should instead reduce its military, digital, and energy dependencies in order to fully assert its strategic autonomy, and this requires strengthening its political unity. More than ever, the construction of a genuine European Federation appears to be the condition for real strategic autonomy, the only framework capable of ensuring our security, prosperity, and sovereignty in the long term.

Reflections by Sophie in 't Veld

Today we have woken up in a new Europe, now the work starts. Because Orbàn’s exit may be a relief, but it does not fix the structural issues.

For starters, the other government leaders in Europe, who have been complaining about Orbàn for many years, have lost their scapegoat. It was easy to blame him for the paralysis in the European Council. But Orbàn was not the only one using his veto right in the European Council to get his way. The only way to avoid a repetition of the Orbán obstruction is to eliminate all vetoes. Now all government leaders have the opportunity to show how committed they really are to a strong EU: are they ready to give up their veto rights and make sure Europe cannot be held hostage anymore by a single leader? Vetoes do not protect national interests, they are only ever used as a bargaining chip or a tool for obstruction, blackmail and extortion by government leaders.

The European Union has been saved by the Hungarian voters. But all the cheering this evening cannot hide the fact that for sixteen years the EU tolerated him. The EPP family protected him for over a decade, until he became too toxic even for them. Despite the Article 7 procedure launched by the European Parliament, the European Council refused to impose any sanctions. And although EU funds for Hungary had been frozen under the rule of law conditionality, the Commission decided to release 10 billion euro to get Orbán to drop his veto against support for Ukraine in 2023.

These structural weaknesses have not disappeared with Orbàn’s departure. Europe urgently needs democratic reform and much more robust mechanisms to protect the rule of law throughout the territory of the EU.

All over Europe and beyond people are celebrating the defeat of a corrupted, nationalist autocrat. Magyar will undoubtedly undertake to restore the damage done to the rule of law in Hungary. And he will likely be more constructive in the European Council. But the next weeks and months will tell where he will take the country. Although he became Orbán's Nemesis, for many years he was part of the inner circle of the Fidesz leadership. He is conservative and stated he will first and foremost defend Hungarian interests in Europe.

Magyar has secured the two-thirds majority he needs to undo the constitutional changes of Orbán. That is a good thing. But any leader holding an absolute majority, without meaningful opposition, has a great responsibility. Who can resist the temptation to abuse that power? Will he use his power to restore checks and balances, to enable strong democratic scrutiny and accountability, even if that is a nuisance?

Three years ago Donald Tusk won the Polish elections, ending eight years of autocratic rule by the PiS party. The European Commission immediately decided to release the EU funds for Poland that had been frozen under the rule of law conditionality. That was a stupid mistake. The Commission seemed to signal that the freezing or unfreezing of EU money was done on the basis of election promises or on the basis of which political party was in power. It became even worse when, a year later, a President was elected who vetoes most of the rule of law reforms.

That mistake should not be repeated. Funds should be released on the basis of actual results and after a thorough assessment by the Commission. The justification of any decision has to be made public. Magyar’s announcement that Hungary will join the European Public Prosecutor’s Office is a very important step in the process.

Moreover, many centrist, progressive and left-wing Hungarians have voted for Magyar, as he was the only candidate who was able to beat Orbàn. But their voice is not represented in the Parliament. Magyar needs to ensure his government represents all those who voted for him. His victory was a victory of the people, not just one party.

There are many challenges ahead. But for the first time since 2010, Europe and Hungary have a chance to restore and strengthen the democratic rule of law, to eradicate corruption and to build a better future. Let us grab that opportunity with both hands!

Sophie is a former Member of the European Parliament for Volt and others. She sat in the Parliament for 20 years until 2024. Originally published on Sophie in 't Veld's blog and redistributed with her permission.

The EU was founded as a peace project, an answer to "never again", and an alternative to the empires of the past. It still is a success today. Is there a country that wants to join China, the USA or Russia voluntarily? No. But the EU does have that magnetic power, and many countries line up to join the EU. 


Still, Europe is not reaching its full potential and is under threat. Russia continues its war, destroying Ukraine. The US pursues imperialistic ambitions. Europe will become a vassal if we don't change. It is not enough for Europe to become resilient to survive. We must become independent to thrive. 


The old order is dead. Europe cannot continue to play by outdated rules. We can build a new order with allies, one where rules and values count.


Tomorrow, European leaders will meet to decide on Europe’s future. They believe that a little bit more cooperation is sufficient to survive. They are wrong. Europe must change – not a little, but a lot.


What we need is real independence. Democratic, military, economic, social, and material independence. Through different speeds or all at once. Volt has a plan.

We can build a better Europe together. One that acts faster, with more power, and is accountable to you, the people. A Europe that speaks with one voice and stands up for democracy and international law. A United States of Europe!

What would this actually look like? Here are the major changes we want.

Democratic independence

• Power to the European people. We want all of us to have the power to elect a European government through real European elections, with European candidates and European parties!

• End the vetocracy. We need to ditch the veto, the ability for a country to stop decisions. Dictators like Orbán cannot have a vote. Europe should make all decisions by majority.

• Speak with one voice. We need a real European foreign minister to stand strong against dictators, defend international law without hypocrisy, stop wars, and prevent new ones.

Military independence

• Fund freedom. We can save billions in spending through Eurobonds, joint procurement, breakthrough tech investment, a European DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), and a fully integrated defence industry.

• Victory for Ukraine. We make sure Ukraine wins by using the frozen Russian assets, setting up a no-fly zone, accelerating membership, and defending any ceasefire with European forces.

• A European army to keep the peace. We build a European command structure, EU-owned strategic enablers such as ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance), and a force of at least 250,000 soldiers ready to defend Europe.

Economic independence

• Finance our future. We issue Eurobonds to invest in our climate neutral digital economy, complete the capital market and banking union, and make the Euro a global currency.

• Thriving innovation. We set a European preference, remove all barriers in the single market, attract talent, establish ''EU Inc.'' and focus industrial policy on new European champions.

• Embrace our friends. We accept many new EU members, forge equitable trade and development deals, and increase collaboration with democratic friends like the UK and Canada.

Digital independence

• Protect the truth. We force social media to respect our values and fight foreign interference, build an EU public broadcaster, keep journalists safe, and enable social media alternatives.

• A European ''tech stack''. We create a home-grown digital infrastructure as alternatives to the US, from A to Z: European AI, data, software, devices, cloud services, network and chips.

• All government services use European tech. We make all government services on all levels use European software and have all data stored on European cloud services by 2030.


Social independence

• A life you can afford. We build affordable homes through smart social housing and renovation projects. We invest in clean tech and a European grid to lower energy prices.

• Culture at home. We sponsor film, music, etc. to stop seeing Europe through American glasses. Culture must not be a privilege but a force of solidarity, by investing in local artists.

• Unlock human potential. We turn Erasmus into a universal European experience, invest in new skills and jobs, and give young people start-up capital for their lives and businesses.

Material independence

• Our own energy. We invest in clean energy like wind, solar and nuclear and batteries to rid ourselves of foreign energy dependency, like LNG from the US, gas and oil from Russia.

• Reclaim industrial leadership. We restore Europe as a manufacturing powerhouse by investing in new economic sectors like deep- and cleantech, and continental high-speed rail.

• Resource our future. We invest in responsible mining, make equitable resource deals with partners, and accelerate recycling and circularity to ensure access to critical raw materials.

Do you agree? Well, your national leaders can make it happen tomorrow, by establishing a United States of Europe that can act to keep you safe and bring a better future closer to now!

So, what are you waiting for? Sign our petition!

Democratic renewal seems to have been a campaign gimmick instead of a serious intention of the political parties. Arizona likes to
present itself as a “government of reform”,
but democratic renewal is
not on the table. While the Vivaldi government still had
a minister of democratic renewal—at least on paper—that portfolio was quietly disposed of by Arizona. Now that the parties are back in
power, democratic renewal
no longer seems urgent.

Elections are seen as legitimizing the status quo, not as a means for citizens to choose their own government and bring about change. Despite compulsory voting, on June 9, one in eight voters—or 12.58%—remained home. Another 5.69% voted blank or invalid, and 4.28% of the votes went to parties that didn’t make the electoral threshold. This means that 22.55% of the voters are not represented in Belgian politics. An even larger part of the votes went to extremist parties, in large part as protest. That should be more than enough reason for all parties to make democratic renewal a core theme.

However, little has happened since the elections. Apart from a few marginal adjustments to party funding, the planned abolition of the Senate, and a bill to neutralise the list vote in favour of the preferential vote, everything remains the same. Real power still lies with the party headquarters, not with the Chamber of Representatives. Parties are still dabbling in political self-appointments, rather than making appointments based on knowledge and skills. Money is still overflowing the party offices, and the cabinets remain obese. Online political advertising is being restricted to some extent, but this is due to European legislation, not reforms on the parties' own initiative. A few parties flirting with the electoral threshold are listlessly searching for their raison d'être, led by party mastodons and nepo babies, while the door remains firmly closed to enthusiastic, young parties, preventing healthy competition and innovation. The party political landscape is rigid and fragmented, with the last truly new political party having emerged decades ago. Meanwhile, Brussels has been held hostage for sixteen months by quarrelling political parties in a surreal and grotesque theatre.

Unsurprisingly, people's trust in political institutions and parties is alarmingly low. Undoubtedly, the discussion about democratic renewal will resurface in the months leading up to the next elections. And just as predictably, it will fall silent again the day after the elections. The proportion of unrepresented voters and angry protest votes will grow again, and the traditional parties will look on concerned once again.

Anyone who is serious about democracy cannot be satisfied with this. That is why Volt is calling for a broad public campaign for democratic renewal. In December 2023, together with several other new parties, we already made a number of proposals to strengthen democracy and increase voter choice. Public funding must once again benefit democracy, not line the pockets of the parties. The voice of the citizens must once again be heard loud and clear through parliament, not through party offices.

Revitalizing our democracy is important for all of us. We invite everyone to join in: political parties and politicians, of course, but also civil society organizations, youth clubs, businesses, neighbourhood committees, artists, trade unions, and anyone else who is passionate about democracy.

General proposals

• Establish a Council of Sages to develop a comprehensive vision for democratic renewal in time for the 2029 elections. In addition to proposals for renewing and strengthening the democratic system, new forms of democratic participation and consultation must also be addressed, as well as rules for social media.

• Establish an independent electoral council to supervise the correct and fair conduct of the elections and to handle complaints.

• Establish a task force to ensure that all election-related IT systems function correctly.

On more open competition and innovation in the political landscape

• The electoral system must be reformed into a fully proportional system, in which every vote counts equally.

• Abolish the electoral threshold and enlarge the constituencies, so that a seat becomes within reach of more parties and greater pluralism is created.

• The double threshold, i.e. the requirement to collect signatures in order to participate in the elections, should be abolished or at least lowered.

• All participating parties should be included in the voting tests in the media, at least on public broadcasting.

• All political parties and movements are represented in the polls, at least on public broadcasting.

• Participation in public broadcasting TV debates will be based on pre-determined public criteria, with the aim of providing information as broad as possible.

• Adoption of the parliamentary bill to neutralise the list vote, in order to increase the independence of elected representatives.

• The introduction of transnational lists for the European elections.

On financing, we advocate for

• A substantial reduction in party funding to the level of comparable European countries

• A ceiling on the holding of financial reserves and a ban on the purchase of real estate or investments

• A reduction in the financial arrangements for elected representatives, including the abolition of tax-free expense allowances for members of parliament

• A ban on multiple mandates, especially in cases where there is a risk of conflict of interest

• The abolition of political cabinets and the depoliticisation of administrations

• A restriction on spending on social media, even outside the election period

• Public funding will be made available to parties that do not reach the electoral threshold but do obtain 2% of the votes

• Parties that are not eligible for public funding will be given a higher limit for donations, but with strict transparency requirements

This forum was prepared in cooperation with Volt France, Volt Luxembourg and Volt Switzerland. For each chapter, women spoke out about their involvement in politics.

“On this International Women’s Day, I remember all women who stood up, spoke out and fought for better lives for all women. From Emmeline Pankhurst to Rosa Parks, to Malala Yousafzai to name a few. My thoughts turn especially to the many brave women throughout our world who continue to fight against oppression today and every day - in Afghanistan, the Middle East, Africa and Ukraine. We stand together with them all. You are my inspiration, you are what drives me to stand up, speak out and protect the freedoms we have.” - Tracey D.

In Belgium, the new government includes only four women (out of fifteen ministers). Prime Minister De Wever says this is unexpected and unfortunate, but it can happen. The federal parliament has 42% women (63 of the 150 federal MPs are women, compared with 64 in the previous term). Among the 22 Belgian MEPs, there are 9 women.

“I am a free woman in a free Europe. I am indebted to the generations before me who fought to secure this freedom for us, and I owe it to our children to defend it. I am with Volt because I believe in Europe. Only together and on an equal footing can we create lasting prosperity – this applies to regions in Belgium, to peoples in Europe and beyond, as well as to the coexistence of men and women in society.” - Ulrike F.

History is full of talented women who have dared and shown the way. Today, too many women don't go into politics or don't dare to take the plunge into politics.

“I joined Volt because of its commitment to diversity, equal opportunities for all, gender balance and female leadership. I am convinced that Belgian women need to be better represented at all levels of management and political life. Every free democratic country, including Belgium, should end gender stereotypes and become more inclusive towards women. In many countries, a higher percentage of women have higher education than men. But more men hold top positions in business and politics. It is high time to change this.” - Natalia R.

Apprehension, lack of moral, financial and logistical support, psychological or educational barriers are all reasons why women still hold back today, even though they have the desire and the skills to play an active part in their country's political life.

“A colleague – like me, a polyglot and europhile – told me about Volt Europa’s project. In the super election year 2024, I worked behind the scenes in Belgium for six months and was a supporting candidate in the provincial elections. Why? Because everyone should be represented among the candidates. Differences in age, gender, origin, religion, or disability make our society so much richer. Just like Europe’s motto: let’s be united in diversity!”– An VG.

In our daily lives, we see both women and men encouraging, advising, debating, innovating, reflecting, proposing, organising, using diplomacy and self-control. Having a sense of commitment, being a good listener, being a team player, being strategic, resilience, honesty, eloquence... these are all human qualities and are not linked to gender.

“I came to Volt because I was tired of the current state of politics and of remaining a passive spectator. I work in the IT sector for the Dutch and Flemish maritime governments. I know all about being the only woman in a male-dominated field. Despite a healthy dose of imposter syndrome, like so many other women, I'm gradually learning to take my place and challenge the status quo. I hope that by being more visible, more women will find the courage to join us, and that more people will realise that we women are much more than our gender.” - Karima EH.

There are still many barriers to women's participation in politics, and we are clear about the battles still to be fought. But on this 8 March 2025, we all want to say together: women have their place in the discussions and in the co-construction of our society.

We want to send out a strong message and an appeal:

We encourage all women to get involved in politics, whatever the nature and degree of their commitment, and we encourage those around them to help them along the way and support them in their actions!

We call on all political parties to take action to include more women and make it easier for them to get involved!

“I've been interested in politics since I was very young, and this passion led me to study political science. I've never felt that being a woman was an obstacle to making my voice heard in society. But in recent years I've seen the rise of the far right and I see the rights of women and minorities under threat in Western countries. I've realised that we must never take these rights for granted, but remain vigilant and fight to defend them. That's what prompted me to get involved with Volt, because I'm convinced that a united and democratic Europe is the best bulwark against nationalism and the regression of human rights’. - Alixxa S.

We have started by reinforcing parity in the public arena: electoral lists, round tables, the media, etc. It is time to go a step further, by creating real spaces for inclusion, expression and projects for women (within parties, in decision-making bodies, etc.), subsidies dedicated to projects by and for women, and reinforced communication with the outside world. Women need to have a more general and systematic presence on the political scene.

It's high time our public policies were made by and for all our fellow citizens.

Volt Belgium and Volt Slovakia thus joined forces to strengthen our party and movement through more female leadership and equal representation. In Volt’s Brussels office, three key Volters and leading advocates for women in politics encouraged active female citizens to help shape the future of Volt and its role in society.

Call to women: Interested in shaping Volt Belgium in the coming months and years? Want to use Volt to raise your voice? Reach out to us!*

Sophie in 't Veld, former MEP and Volt Europa and Belgium lead candidate, highlighted male-dominated party cultures. She continues to highlight the need to change these political contexts so that women can develop their full potential.

Lucia Klestinkova, co-founder of Volt Slovakia and coach for female leadership, called on women to join Volt to support a change in politics. It is also an opportunity for women to raise their voices, exercise their skills and gain leadership experience, she highlighted.

Rick Zednik, fellow co-founder of Volt Slovakia and former managing director of “Women Political Leaders”, highlighted the dismal number of women in politics. With three quarters of party members being men, issues important to women receive less attention. And political cultures and results, as well as society, suffer the consequences.

Erika Schulze, Volt Brussels co-city lead and initiator of the event, called on women to join Volt to realise their dreams of a more inclusive and gender equal society - and to make a difference.

Dear Members and Supporters,

everyone at Volt Belgium wishes you a Happy New Year 2025! May they new year bring you much joy and luck. We look forward to toast to the new year with you in person this Friday in Gent. 🍀🎇💜

In this newsletter we will share with you information about:

• New Year’s Reception

• ⁠Lapsing Membership Contributions

• ⁠Internal Elections

• Upcoming Events

Let’s dive into it!

New Year’s Reception

Friday, 3 January: You are invited to our New Year’s Reception in Gent to celebrate the beginning of 2025 together. It will be a great opportunity to meet new and known Volters and to get to know the board!

Our team welcomes you at the Afkikker from 16.00. At 19.00, our Co-President Carlo Giudice will give a speech and share with you some inspiring words. You will also receive information by our Electoral Commission on the Internal Elections, which we will talk about further below in this newsletter.

Not a Member yet? You do not have to be a Member to attend the Reception, though it will be a great moment to sign up.

Become a Member now!

Share the invitation with your network!

⁠Lapsing Membership

The membership of half of our Members has lapsed on January 1st. The Members in question have received an Email by ClubCollect, our Volt solution to collect Membership Contributions, informing them either that the amount will be directly debited or that you must make the payment.

As a reminder, the amount billed is based on the tier of contribution you have chosen when you signed up to Volt. In the case that you received an invoice, please pay within one month from now, after which your membership will be automatically terminated if no payment was received.

If you have not received an email, it means that your membership lapses later in the year depending on your sign up date, though the process is the same.

Should you wish to change the contribution tier, have questions about the payment or wish to not renew your membership, please contact administration@voltbelgium.org.

⁠Internal Elections

In December, Volt Belgium has sent out the formal call for candidates for the party’s organs: Board of Administrators, Electoral Commission, and Arbitration Commission. The election will take place at Volt Belgium’s General Assembly on Saturday 8 February 2025.

You are strongly encouraged to apply by sending your CV and motivation to electoral-commission@voltbelgium.org - the deadline for application is 17 January 2025 at 23h59. More information about the requirements can be found here.

In order to be eligible to apply or vote for the internal elections, you must be effective members of Volt Belgium as of 8 January 2025 and have paid any outstanding membership contributions.

Not a Member yet?

Become a Member now!

The election of the party’s Board of Administrators will play a key role in shaping this strategy, as members can choose the candidates they believe have the best ideas to guide us forward. The newly elected Board will set the course for Volt Belgium’s priorities and actions in the years to come.

Upcoming Events

We are excited to announce a series of events to kick off the year and foster connections within our vibrant community:

• Sunday, 5 January & Saturday, 11 January; both at 11am: Tune in for an online information session on the internal elections. Learn which positions you can apply for. To join the Google Meets: click here. Reminder: You need to be a member by 8 January to apply, so sign up now.

• Friday, 10 January: Volt Brussels will host the “Women in leadership” workshop. This first event aims at preparing for the upcoming Board elections and is targeted at our female members with a current or distant interest in taking up leadership positions. Check out the agenda.

• Saturday, 8 February: Attend our in-person General Assembly in Brussels, a chance to engage with fellow members and influence the direction of our party by electing the new members of the party’s organs.

• Sunday, 23 February: Join us in supporting Volt in the German Federal Elections, where we aim to make history by reaching the 5% and enter with 35 Members of Parliament. Let’s cheer on our German Volters as they lead the charge for a stronger Europe.

Also new: Every Saturday - Permanence at the Volt Hub: every Saturday in January (4th, 11th, 18th and 25th) morning from 10:00 to 14:00, the Volt Hub will be open to the general public, so feel free to join the Brussels team and give a hand in welcoming new people. Google Maps.

All information will be made available here: https://voltbelgium.org/events

Let’s colour 2025 purple! 💜

2025 promises to be a pivotal year with several key activities on our horizon. With our municipal councillor Tracey D’Afters and our city teams we will organise events and debates to establish Volt as a constructive political player in Belgium. This effort will give us the foundation to build on in the coming years, paving the way for success in the 2029 and 2030 elections.

With anticipation and determination,
Carlo Giovanni Giudice
and the Team of Volt Belgium 💜

Join Now Donate

Dear Members and Supporters,

As the year draws to a close, we take a moment to reflect on an incredible journey filled with achievements, growth, and resilience. 2024 was a year that truly tested and showcased our collective spirit, marked by numerous elections across Belgium and remarkable milestones for Volt Belgium.

This year, we proudly celebrated a historic moment with the election of our very first Volter in Belgium: Tracey D’Afters representing Volt in the Tervuren municipality. This victory is more than a seat; it’s a symbol of the change we stand for and the progress we are capable of achieving.

Overall, over a hundred dedicated candidates stepped forward to represent Volt in the June and October elections. Their commitment and courage have laid the groundwork for a brighter future and showcased the breadth of talent within our movement.

On a European level, our movement has been equally inspiring, with five Volters having been elected to the European Parliament this June, who together with more than 200 elected Volters and close to 30,000 Members advocate for a united, greener, and fairer Europe.

Back home, Volt Belgium has grown stronger than ever, surpassing 500 members and becoming Volt’s third biggest national chapter. This milestone reflects the increasing resonance of our values and vision with people across the country. Furthermore, our community’s commitment has been bolstered by generous support, with major and smaller donations totaling over €50,000. These contributions have been crucial in driving our campaign and directly contributed to the election of Tracey. Another important milestone was the adoption of new governance documents, ensuring that our party grows more mature, inclusive, and ready to tackle the challenges of the coming years.

None of these achievements would have been possible without the unwavering dedication of our volunteers. Whether working tirelessly on the streets or behind the scenes, their efforts have been the heartbeat of our movement. To each and every one of you who gave your time, energy, and passion—thank you. You are the reason Volt Belgium is becoming a household name in Belgian politics.

Looking ahead to 2025

As we step into the new year, we are filled with anticipation and determination. 2025 promises to be a pivotal year with several key activities on our horizon:

• Election of the party’s organs: This week Volt Belgium has sent out the formal call for candidates for the party’s organs: Board of Administrators, Electoral Commission, and Arbitration Commission. The election will take place at Volt Belgium’s General Assembly on Saturday 8 February 2025. You are strongly encouraged to apply by sending your CV and motivation to eb@voltbelgium.org - the deadline for application is 17 January 2025 at 23h59. More information about the requirements can be found here.

• Decisions on the party’s political strategy: The election of the party’s Board of Administrators will play a key role in shaping this strategy, as members can choose the candidates they believe have the best ideas to guide us forward. The newly elected Board will set the course for Volt Belgium’s priorities and actions in the years to come.

• Making an impact in Tervuren and beyond: We must support Tracey with events, communications, and policymaking to help her establish Volt as a constructive political player in Belgium. This effort will give us the foundation to build on in the coming years, paving the way for success in the 2029 and 2030 elections.

Together, we will continue to make waves across Belgium, shaping a future that aligns with our shared values of progress, unity, and sustainability.

Save the dates

We are excited to announce a series of events to kick off the year and foster connections within our vibrant community:

• Friday, 3 January: You are invited to our New Year’s Reception in Gent to celebrate the beginning of 2025 together. This will be an opportunity to meet new and known Volters and to get to know the board! You may share the invitation with your network.

• Saturday, 8 February: Attend our in-person General Assembly in Brussels, a chance to engage with fellow members and influence the direction of our party by electing the new members of the party’s organs.

• Sunday, 23 February: Join us in supporting Volt in the German Federal Elections, where we aim to make history by reaching the 5% and enter with 35 Members of Parliament. Let’s cheer on our German Volters as they lead the charge for a stronger Europe.

All information will be made available here: https://voltbelgium.org/events

Thank you for being part of this movement

As we bid farewell to 2024, let’s carry forward the lessons and victories of this year into the next. Volt Belgium is more than a political party; it is a community of changemakers, dreamers, and doers. Together, we will continue to break barriers and create a better tomorrow.

Warmest wishes for the holidays and an inspiring start to 2025.

With gratitude and optimism,
Carlo Giovanni Giudice
and the Team of Volt Belgium

Join Now Donate

Our country needs reforms and investments to ensure a prosperous future Everyone understands the need to balance the budget, but thinking only in terms of austerity is playing with fire. Austerity policies that lead to a recession are an expensive mistake. While pensions must be reformed to remain sustainable and a fair tax reform with lower labor taxes is essential, we must not forget the other side of the coin: investing in growth, sustainability, and innovation. Only then can we truly move forward.

Take the Draghi report: a clear wake-up call. Europe is falling behind. While economic growth thrives in the United States and China, we remain stuck. Without massive investments, we risk losing our prosperity. The climate transition and green growth are not obstacles but levers for success. Investing in clean energy, the circular economy, and smart infrastructure creates jobs and progress while securing a healthier, more livable future.

Smart reforms, bold investments
Reforms don’t have to be painful—on the contrary. Look at the four-day workweek, tested in Ireland and the United Kingdom. With unchanged salaries and shorter workweeks, companies report a slight increase in productivity. Even more impressive: burnout cases dropped by 71%, and sick days by 65%. In Belgium, 9% of workers were absent due to illness every day in the first half of 2024. That’s an immense cost for our social security system. If a shorter, healthier workweek is possible, why not try it? Fewer sick days, more well-being, and net savings: that’s smart reform.

Reforming also means cutting unnecessary regulations and bureaucracy. Simplifying procedures not only makes life easier but also gives businesses and citizens the room to grow and innovate. Removing excessive administrative burdens—“cutting red tape”—is a logical step toward greater efficiency.

Stronger Together: European Cooperation Is Key
Greater European cooperation and shared investments are vital to improving efficiency and securing our future. Only by working together can we tackle challenges like the climate crisis and economic stagnation. At the same time, we must avoid counterproductive measures like border controls, recently proposed by countries such as the Netherlands and Germany. These policies not only harm our economy but also undermine the free movement that Europe stands for. Cooperation isn’t optional—it’s essential.

Public transport: more than just savings
The same goes for public transport. The drastic cuts currently on the table for trains are a disaster waiting to happen. It’s not just ecologically counterproductive but also economically shortsighted. Good public transport pays for itself. Every kilometer traveled by train or bus is cheaper for society than one traveled by car. Fewer traffic jams, less air pollution, and better accessibility. This isn’t an expense; it’s an investment that delivers.

Choose a future that inspires
Our country deserves better than a policy that stands still. Reforms are necessary, but without investments, it’s like bailing water out of a sinking ship. Green growth and the climate transition don’t just address today’s crises; they lay the foundation for a vibrant economy tomorrow. What we need now is courage. The courage to invest in what matters. The courage to not only save but to build. For a future that inspires.

Statement from Volt Belgium on rising rising vandalism and intimidation

The leadership of Volt Belgium was made aware of troubling acts of vandalism and intimidation against some of our candidates and their campaign materials in recent days. These actions are not just an attack on individuals but on the democratic process itself. Such acts of vandalism and intimidation undermine our shared values and diminish the integrity of our democracy. This behaviour has no place in Belgian society, and we unequivocally condemn it.

The political landscape thrives on the exchange of ideas and respectful debate. Everyone has the right to express their opinion without fear of intimidation.

I urge all democratic parties to denounce such threats and violence. It is imperative that we come together to defend our democratic values and ensure that electoral campaigns now and in the future are fair and respectful. We must engage in meaningful debates on policy, not allow intimidation or fear to dictate the conversation.

— Carlo Giovanni Giudice, Co-President of Volt Belgium

Volt Belgium and its local teams stand united against these acts of aggression. Volt calls for respectful dialogue and constructive engagement focused on the issues that matter most to our communities.

"Belgium cannot lag behind," warns Carlo Giovanni Giudice, Co-Chair of Volt Belgium. "Draghi's message is even more relevant for our country. The negotiations for the federal and Flemish governments are stalling, and the economic situation is deteriorating. We see declining productivity, companies relocating, and a lack of much-needed investments. This is not the time for half-hearted measures. Belgium needs substantial reforms."

The party specifically points to recent reports about Audi's departure and the uncertainty surrounding chip manufacturer BelGaN as examples of an economy on its last legs. The Arizona coalition's [the intended new coalition of N-VA, CD&V, Vooruit, MR, Les Engagés] austerity plans are dismissed as "completely unrealistic" and unable to bring about the necessary structural improvements.

Sophie in ’t Veld, former Member of the European Parliament and lead candidate for Volt Europa, echoes the call:
"This is the moment to choose vision over party-political games. We need strong, progressive reforms to make Belgium and Europe future-proof. The date of October 13 should symbolize political leadership, not political cowardice."

Volt Belgium emphasises that the future of the country and Europe depends on the ability to let go of entrenched structures and ideologies and advocates for bold reforms that benefit both the economy and the quality of life of citizens.

END OF PRESS RELEASE

What is Volt? 
Volt Belgium is the national chapter of Volt Europa — the  pan-European political movement, with 200+ elected local officials in towns, cities and national parliaments. Five newly elected Members of the European Parliament including Damian Boeselager, founder of Volt in 2017. Across 30+ countries, Volt has 24.000+ members and hundreds of local teams, including Volt Brussels, Volt Tervuren and Volt Leuven. 

Volt's vision is that of a progressive Europe with a democratically elected European government, a socially just society, an economy that nurtures our climate and positive digitalization. 

Please feel free to use Volt photos (©Volt Europa, 2024)

Contact
Bianca Baumler
Volt Belgium, Media Officer 
press@voltbelgium.org, +32 4 89 61 86 30

We are gearing up for the local and provincial elections on 13 October by running on different lists throughout the country. To be allowed to participate, Volt needs your support through citizen signatures. Please sign for our lists in your place of residence by 13 September (1x provincial and 1x municipal where applicable).

It's time for renewal and change—it's time for #GenerationVolt!

Signing is possible via this link.

Click on the button, adjust your message if needed, and send it!
Copy or download the image to share - you can also find it on the drive

[Find the Dutch, French, and English versions below]

NL: Hoi! In deze onzekere tijden is het belangrijker dan ooit om onze stem te laten horen op 9 juni. Stem op Volt voor een sterk, verenigd en duurzaam Europa en België. Volt zet zich in voor onze veiligheid, een menselijk migratiebeleid, ambitieuze klimaatdoelen en een duurzame economie. Jouw stem kan echt het verschil maken! Twijfel je? Kijk dan op de standpuntenpagina's: https://voltbelgie.org/standpunten

<Send message 1>

FR: En ces temps incertains, il est plus important que jamais de faire entendre notre voix le 9 juin. Votez pour Volt, pour une Europe et une Belgique fortes, unies et durables. Volt s'engage pour notre sécurité, pour une politique migratoire humaine, pour des objectifs ambitieux en matière de climat et une économie durable. Souhaitez vous en savoir plus ? Découvrez nos points de vue sur notre site: https://voltbelgique.org/politiques

<Send message 2>

EN: Hi! In these uncertain times, it is more important than ever to make our voices heard on June 9th. Vote for Volt for a strong, united, and sustainable Europe and Belgium. Volt is committed to our safety, a humane migration policy, ambitious climate goals, and a sustainable economy. Your vote can truly make a difference! Not convinced yet? Then check out our positions pages: https://voltbelgium.org/policies

<Send message 3>

Ben je benieuwd hoe jouw standpunten overeenkomen met die van Volt, maar kon je ons niet vinden in de VRT stemtest? Wij lossen dit graag voor je op! Volt heeft een uitgebreid verkiezingsprogramma en deelt graag zijn visie en standpunten met de kiezers.

Stemtest Europees Parlement
➡ https://voltbelgium.org/stemtest-ep

Stemtest Federaal Parlement
➡ https://voltbelgium.org/stemtest-fp

Stemtest Vlaams Parlement
➡ https://voltbelgium.org/stemtest-vp

Stemtest RTBF
➡ https://voltbelgium.org/test-electoral-rtbf